Founding audit · $300

Where AI mentions your brand.

How you compare, and what to change next. A $300 audit for B2B SaaS that already publishes. Not a promise you’ll be recommended.

Request an AI visibility audit

Who it is for

One software category, founders or marketers you can actually reach. If the site has nothing a buyer could cite, the report says that first. Help-desk, analytics, billing, and developer tools are a fit. Local services and brand-new domains with no public pages are not.

What you receive

Visibility in the sample
Mention rate on discovery questions, kept separate from questions that already name your brand. Both runs shown, not averaged away.
Competitor comparison
Who is named when you are not, on the same questions, in the same assistants.
Evidence
The question, assistant, date, search setting, brands mentioned, and cited sources.
Five actions
Each one is evidence, a change, a priority, and how to check later. Pages you control are separate from coverage you have to earn.

Scope, date, and the $300 price are agreed before the panel starts. Delivery is the report plus a short walkthrough.

$300 founding audit

One paid pilot, not a subscription and not a published rate. The price tests whether a specific report is worth paying for. After the walkthrough you can book a later measurement. That is separate, and only after changes have had time to be indexed.

Sample report

Independent sample for a public company, Help Scout. They are not a customer. The row below shows how an answer is logged. It is not a completed 40-answer panel, and it is not their market share.

Format specimen

Help Scout · customer support software

Category rivals a buyer already names: Zendesk, Intercom, Front. Discovery questions never include the brand. Brand questions are scored in a second table.

How mention rate is counted

Mention rate = answers that name the brand ÷ answers tested. It describes this sample only. Two runs of the same question can disagree. That disagreement stays in the report.

Example of one logged answer row
Field	Example row, not a logged result
Question	Best shared inbox for a small support team
Type	Discovery. The brand is not in the question.
Assistant	ChatGPT, search on. Fresh chat.
Run 1	Zendesk named. Help Scout absent. Cited: a help center and a review directory.
Run 2	Intercom named. Help Scout named, not linked.
Note	The two runs do not agree. The report does not collapse them into one percent.

How an action is written

Evidence. Discovery runs cite a rival’s help center, not the comparison page.
Change. Open the comparison with a 40-word answer a model can lift.
Priority. This week. You control the page.
Check. Rerun the same question, same assistant, same search setting, after the page is indexed. A single new run is not a result.

Owned changes (your pages) are listed apart from earned coverage (directories, reviews, other people’s articles). Neither list promises that you will be recommended.

Later

Coming soon

The audit is the product you can buy. These three are the software around it, and they are not built yet.

Who runs it

I’m Azamat. For these founding audits I run the questions myself, in fresh chats, and write five actions from the log. If a finding is not in the log, it is not in the report. I don’t sell placement, and I don’t treat a later bump as proof that a change caused it.

hello@bliset.app

Questions

Do I need chatbots to recommend Bliset first?: No. A useful sample of your category is the proof. Bliset does not have to be mentioned anywhere before the first audit.
Will you guarantee mentions?: No. The report records a fixed sample. It does not sell placement, and it does not claim a later change in answers was caused by the work.
What is a work email for?: So the reply goes to the company, not a personal inbox that nobody else can find. A founder address is fine.

Request an AI visibility audit

Name, work email, website, and the competitors buyers already compare you with. I’ll reply to confirm scope before any panel starts.